Aperture Science: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

16 March 2021

30 January 2021

11 October 2020

11 June 2020

9 October 2019

5 March 2019

17 May 2018

22 April 2018

12 March 2017

27 May 2016

  • curprev 17:4217:42, 27 May 2016Nowayhaze talk contribsm 6,321 bytes −137 removed citation for f-numbers. The page shows pictures as illustration of various f-numbers. By coincidence the f/2.8 diagram looks similar to the aperture logo, but alas it is only a diagram, not what f/2.8 always looks like.
  • curprev 17:3617:36, 27 May 2016Nowayhaze talk contribs 6,458 bytes −92 f-number makes no sense if there isn't a defined focal length. We see no lens or any specifications of such a lens in the logo, therefore f/2.8 is absurd.

13 November 2015

28 September 2015

19 August 2015

18 August 2015

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)