No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
What exactly are these categories supposed to mean? I've been wondering this for a while now, and since the [[Curiosity Core]], [[Intelligence Core]], and the [[Anger Core]] all have articles now, they should, logically, be on the nav. [[User:Sven|~Sven~]] ([[User talk:Sven|talk]]) 18:38, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | What exactly are these categories supposed to mean? I've been wondering this for a while now, and since the [[Curiosity Core]], [[Intelligence Core]], and the [[Anger Core]] all have articles now, they should, logically, be on the nav. [[User:Sven|~Sven~]] ([[User talk:Sven|talk]]) 18:38, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Dunno what those really mean. Probably should be a big flat list instead, with these new lists as well. Or maybe separated by Portal/Portal 2 — [[User:WindPower|Wind]] 19:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | :Dunno what those really mean. Probably should be a big flat list instead, with these new lists as well. Or maybe separated by Portal/Portal 2 — [[User:WindPower|Wind]] 19:41, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
:: I'll condense it into a single line then. [[User:Sven|~Sven~]] ([[User talk:Sven|talk]]) 05:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:25, 23 February 2013
Cores Group
Just throwing an idea out there; would it be an idea to add a seperate line for the cores? I'd add it myself but I wasn't too sure if the cores are significant enough to have their own section in this. 
Lord Melchior 
06:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- As it stands right now, only four (Wheatley, Space, Adventure, Fact) have their own articles, while ALL the cores have a subsection on the main "Core" page. I'd support the idea if all the cores had their own articles.Sven 12:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Raw/Input cores
What exactly are these categories supposed to mean? I've been wondering this for a while now, and since the Curiosity Core, Intelligence Core, and the Anger Core all have articles now, they should, logically, be on the nav. ~Sven~ (talk) 18:38, 22 February 2013 (UTC)