User contributions for Nowayhaze
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
27 May 2016
- 17:4217:42, 27 May 2016 diff hist −137 m Aperture Science removed citation for f-numbers. The page shows pictures as illustration of various f-numbers. By coincidence the f/2.8 diagram looks similar to the aperture logo, but alas it is only a diagram, not what f/2.8 always looks like.
- 17:3617:36, 27 May 2016 diff hist −92 Aperture Science f-number makes no sense if there isn't a defined focal length. We see no lens or any specifications of such a lens in the logo, therefore f/2.8 is absurd.