Talk:Gestures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Replacing with out imbedded signature) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::: Most items should have their own pages, yes, but I really don't think it's worth giving every entry in the schema a page when, for gestures, on two single pages the same info is shown neatly and accessibly. Same thing but less tabs to open. <span style="color:#0070FF;">'''seb'''</span> 04:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC) | :::: Most items should have their own pages, yes, but I really don't think it's worth giving every entry in the schema a page when, for gestures, on two single pages the same info is shown neatly and accessibly. Same thing but less tabs to open. <span style="color:#0070FF;">'''seb'''</span> 04:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::I think that we'll want video demonstrations for gestures eventually, and putting them all gestures of one bot on one page would be like 8~10 videos or something, so I think it'd get spammy — [[User:WindPower|Wind]] 04:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC) | :::::I think that we'll want video demonstrations for gestures eventually, and putting them all gestures of one bot on one page would be like 8~10 videos or something, so I think it'd get spammy — [[User:WindPower|Wind]] 04:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::::On the other hand, I think that all the pages there would be with not that much information would look equally as bad. Maybe we could add another column with a direct link to the YouTube page would work instead of imbedding them. | ::::::On the other hand, I think that all the pages there would be with not that much information would look equally as bad. Maybe we could add another column with a direct link to the YouTube page would work instead of imbedding them.[[User:MogDog66|MogDog66]] 05:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:39, 29 April 2011
Separate articles are kinda annoying to navigate... maybe we can merge them and create Atlas gestures and P-body gestures? seb 02:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Every gesture listed here is an item, so I believe they should be treated as such. If nothing else to give OPP2 something to link to. -- Lagg 02:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that they should be documented, but as separate pages seems rather like a rather convoluted way to do it. But luckily, thanks to our friend
{{anchor}}
, redirects from schema titles are easy. seb 02:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)- Skins would be a better candidate for this than Gestures - less items. However I'd prefer to stick to 1 page per item. RJackson 03:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Most items should have their own pages, yes, but I really don't think it's worth giving every entry in the schema a page when, for gestures, on two single pages the same info is shown neatly and accessibly. Same thing but less tabs to open. seb 04:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think that we'll want video demonstrations for gestures eventually, and putting them all gestures of one bot on one page would be like 8~10 videos or something, so I think it'd get spammy — Wind 04:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- On the other hand, I think that all the pages there would be with not that much information would look equally as bad. Maybe we could add another column with a direct link to the YouTube page would work instead of imbedding them.MogDog66 05:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think that we'll want video demonstrations for gestures eventually, and putting them all gestures of one bot on one page would be like 8~10 videos or something, so I think it'd get spammy — Wind 04:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Most items should have their own pages, yes, but I really don't think it's worth giving every entry in the schema a page when, for gestures, on two single pages the same info is shown neatly and accessibly. Same thing but less tabs to open. seb 04:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Skins would be a better candidate for this than Gestures - less items. However I'd prefer to stick to 1 page per item. RJackson 03:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that they should be documented, but as separate pages seems rather like a rather convoluted way to do it. But luckily, thanks to our friend