Talk:Central AI Chamber: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In the opening paragraph to the Portal 2 section, there is that one sentence which I feel needs proof. I've read many different sources that claim anywhere to a few decades to around 200 years or so after the events of Portal. [[User:Sven|Sven]] 04:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | In the opening paragraph to the Portal 2 section, there is that one sentence which I feel needs proof. I've read many different sources that claim anywhere to a few decades to around 200 years or so after the events of Portal. [[User:Sven|Sven]] 04:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
:Well it's clearly not just a few years as a previous editor wrote, given how the vegetation has grown — [[User:WindPower|Wind]] 04:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | :Well it's clearly not just a few years as a previous editor wrote, given how the vegetation has grown — [[User:WindPower|Wind]] 04:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
::I think that "thousands of years" is a bit of an overestimate, given that the various posters and such surely would've decomposed by that time, especially in Old Aperture's apparently toxic environment. [[User:Sven|Sven]] 06:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:20, 3 March 2012
"Thousands of years after..."
In the opening paragraph to the Portal 2 section, there is that one sentence which I feel needs proof. I've read many different sources that claim anywhere to a few decades to around 200 years or so after the events of Portal. Sven 04:28, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well it's clearly not just a few years as a previous editor wrote, given how the vegetation has grown — Wind 04:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- I think that "thousands of years" is a bit of an overestimate, given that the various posters and such surely would've decomposed by that time, especially in Old Aperture's apparently toxic environment. Sven 06:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)