Aperture Science: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

15 April 2023

15 January 2023

27 March 2022

7 March 2022

12 July 2021

16 March 2021

30 January 2021

11 October 2020

11 June 2020

9 October 2019

5 March 2019

17 May 2018

22 April 2018

12 March 2017

27 May 2016

  • curprev 17:4217:42, 27 May 2016Nowayhaze talk contribsm 6,321 bytes −137 removed citation for f-numbers. The page shows pictures as illustration of various f-numbers. By coincidence the f/2.8 diagram looks similar to the aperture logo, but alas it is only a diagram, not what f/2.8 always looks like.
  • curprev 17:3617:36, 27 May 2016Nowayhaze talk contribs 6,458 bytes −92 f-number makes no sense if there isn't a defined focal length. We see no lens or any specifications of such a lens in the logo, therefore f/2.8 is absurd.

13 November 2015

28 September 2015

19 August 2015

18 August 2015

15 March 2015

16 May 2014

6 June 2013

27 March 2013

3 July 2012

9 May 2012

16 July 2011

14 June 2011

12 June 2011

2 June 2011

  • curprev 00:4200:42, 2 June 2011Wormhole talk contribs 5,412 bytes +1,250 Upgraded the product list to a shiny new ultracool gallery (with possible corrections needed. Possible side-effects may include pure awesomeness).

8 May 2011

6 May 2011

3 May 2011

30 April 2011

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)