User talk:Arhimond: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
64 × 64 (4 KB)??? - jpg file can not weigh so little | 64 × 64 (4 KB)??? - jpg file can not weigh so little | ||
<img src="http://arximond.ucoz.ru/Untitled-2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /> | <img src="http://arximond.ucoz.ru/Untitled-2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /> | ||
I look at the Russian version of the page | I look at the Russian version of the page <small>— ''The preceding unsigned comment was added by'' '''[[User:Arhimond|Arhimond]]''' ([[User talk:Arhimond|talk]]) • ([[Special:Contributions/Arhimond|contribs]]) </small> | ||
:It can be so little. Multi-band images can be much, much smaller than normal ones, that is why they are used. Opera doesn't support them, however. If you don't beleive me that it can be that small and still lose no quality, simply look at the page in another browser like Firefox or Chrome or even Internet Explorer. — [[User:WindPower|Wind]] 18:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:22, 18 October 2011
Achievement images
Why overwrite them with the same image? o.O — Wind 16:42, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- I am warning you, it is unnecessary to overwrite those images with the same image that they already are. It takes up server space for no additional benefit. If you keep doing this, I will have to stop you :( And I don't want to do that. — Wind 16:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
<img src="http://arximond.ucoz.ru/Untitled-2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /> 64 × 64 (4 KB)??? - jpg file can not weigh so little <img src="http://arximond.ucoz.ru/Untitled-2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /> I look at the Russian version of the page — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arhimond (talk) • (contribs)
- It can be so little. Multi-band images can be much, much smaller than normal ones, that is why they are used. Opera doesn't support them, however. If you don't beleive me that it can be that small and still lose no quality, simply look at the page in another browser like Firefox or Chrome or even Internet Explorer. — Wind 18:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)